InsideTracker vs Everlywell
InsideTracker vs Everlywell: InsideTracker is $499 (on-demand (pay per test, discounted with membership)), and Everlywell is $399 (once per year (83 biomarkers)). Everlywell costs less, and Everlywell covers more biomarkers (85 vs 48).
I've reviewed InsideTracker in detail. To build this comparison I pulled each provider's current biomarker list and pricing, then normalized the marker names so the counts line up like for like.
Below I compare the two side by side: pricing and cost per biomarker, the exact tests each panel includes and where they diverge, who founded each company and whether a doctor is on the team, and the apps and any AI each has built.
InsideTracker vs Everlywell: pricing
| InsideTracker | Everlywell | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $499 | $399 |
| Cadence | On-demand (pay per test, discounted with membership) | Once per year (83 biomarkers) |
| Biomarkers | 48 | 85 |
| Cost per biomarker | $10.40 | $4.69 |
Cost per biomarker is the sticker price divided by the number of markers, a rough apples-to-apples figure. It ignores cadence, the app, and any doctor review, which the sections below cover.
InsideTracker vs Everlywell: biomarkers compared
InsideTracker's Ultimate covers 48 biomarkers and Everlywell's Everlywell 360 covers 85. They share 41. 7 are unique to InsideTracker and 44 are unique to Everlywell.
Only in InsideTracker (7)
- Apolipoprotein B
- Creatine Kinase (CK)
- Folate
- Free Testosterone
- Progesterone
- RBC Magnesium
- Sex Hormone Binding Globulin (SHBG)
Only in Everlywell (44)
- Albumin/Globulin Ratio
- Alkaline Phosphatase
- Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH)
- Antinuclear Antibodies (ANA)
- BUN (Blood Urea Nitrogen)
- BUN/Creatinine Ratio
- Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
- Chloride
- Cholesterol/HDL Ratio
- Creatinine
- eGFR (Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate)
- Follicle Stimulating Hormone (FSH)
- Free T3 (Triiodothyronine)
- Free T4 (Thyroxine)
- Globulin
- Homocysteine
- Lipoprotein (a)
- Luteinizing Hormone (LH)
- Mean Corpuscular Volume (MCV)
- Non-HDL Cholesterol
- PSA Free
- PSA Percent Free
- PSA Total
- Thyroglobulin Antibodies
- Thyroid Peroxidase Antibodies
- Total Bilirubin
- Total Protein
- Uric Acid
- Urine Appearance
- Urine Bacteria
- Urine Bilirubin
- Urine Blood
- Urine Color
- Urine Glucose
- Urine Hyaline Casts
- Urine Ketones
- Urine Nitrite
- Urine pH
- Urine Protein
- Urine Red Blood Cells
- Urine Specific Gravity
- Urine Squamous Epithelial Cells
- Urine White Blood Cells
- Zinc
Show the 41 biomarkers both include
- Alanine Aminotransferase
- Albumin
- Aspartate Aminotransferase
- Basophils
- Calcium
- Cortisol
- DHEA-Sulfate
- Eosinophils
- Estradiol (E2)
- Fasting Insulin
- Ferritin
- Gamma-Glutamyl Transferase
- Glucose
- HDL Cholesterol
- Hematocrit
- Hemoglobin
- Hemoglobin A1c
- High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein
- Iron
- Iron Saturation
- LDL Cholesterol
- Lymphocytes
- Magnesium
- Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin (MCH)
- Mean Corpuscular Hemoglobin Concentration (MCHC)
- Mean Platelet Volume (MPV)
- Monocytes
- Neutrophils
- Platelet Count
- Potassium
- Red Blood Cell Count
- Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW)
- Sodium
- Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone
- Total Cholesterol
- Total Iron Binding Capacity
- Total Testosterone
- Triglycerides
- Vitamin B12
- Vitamin D (25-Hydroxy)
- White Blood Cell Count
InsideTracker vs Everlywell: founders and team
InsideTracker
Doctor on founding team? No
- Founded: 2009
- Funding: ~$17.5M raised; $15M Series B (2022, led by PeakBridge)
- Founders:
- Gil Blander, PhD — Founder & Chief Scientific Officer
Founded by biologist Gil Blander, PhD (not a physician), with scientists from Harvard, MIT, and Tufts. Legal entity Segterra.
Everlywell
Doctor on founding team? No
- Founded: 2015
- Funding: $250M+ raised; $175M Series D (2020, led by Goodwater & Highland) at a ~$1.3B valuation
- Founders:
- Julia Cheek, MBA — Founder & CEO
Founded by Julia Cheek (Harvard MBA, not a physician); oversight is an independent virtual physician network. Parent company Everly Health formed in 2021.
InsideTracker vs Everlywell: apps and technology
| InsideTracker | Everlywell | |
|---|---|---|
| iOS app | ✓ | ✓ |
| Android app | ✓ | — |
| Web app | ✓ | ✓ |
| Trained its own AI model | — | — |
- InsideTracker: Markets a "proprietary AI engine" (machine learning plus computational biology), but hasn't announced a self-trained foundation model.
- Everlywell: Native iOS app and web; a native Android app isn't confirmed. Its 2025 "Eva" AI assistant uses machine-learning and voice models, not a proprietary trained foundation model.
InsideTracker vs Everlywell: which is better?
On the numbers, Everlywell is the stronger value here: it covers more biomarkers and costs less. Check the biomarker breakdown above before deciding: InsideTracker has 7 markers Everlywell doesn't, and Everlywell has 44 that InsideTracker skips, so the right choice depends on which of those you actually care about.